One of my projects at work is getting contacts in each of the departments of both my shop and the paper to revise their portions of a course guide for a company wide leadership program. This is a little challenging this year. There is a bit of process revision going on in each department as we gather what courses are still valid, what's no longer valid and what last year's participants [1] said needed improvement.
Part of what I found out in looking at last year's feedback is that some courses weren't taken until a friend vouched for them, because the descriptions weren't very descriptive. So, being the chair of this year's curriculum committee, one of my goals became giving the descriptions more punch. Or, rather, asking each of the departments to punch them up.
By and large, it's been coming along, but one department I've gone back and forth with a couple of times. The staffer I've been talking with asked me, "Why are they being really critical this year."
Well, it's not a they, really. It's me. I explained what I was doing, why I was asking for more changes. She said OK and said she'd have the edits back later in the day.
Yes, it's work I'm asking people to do, but I'm happy for insisting on what I want from the project. And I figure, if I'm getting one or two people out of their comfort zones, in a respectful way, that's good.
- I was one, and provided quite a bit of the feedback
|